I wanted to take an opportunity to thank the town of Eagle Trustees for bringing Eagle River Station to a public vote, since it is a landmark decision for our community. While much of the debate has been polarized, I have heard some consensus: most agree we should attract more business off Interstate 70, increase tax revenue for the town and create jobs.

Given that, is ERS the best way for us to do that? It's highly unlikely.

The lifestyle center mall is an outdated concept as retail trends continue to evolve. The necessary infrastructure costs are expensive, with little assurances in place. The town might see some money about the time the project will need to be redeveloped. Even assuming success, the project fails to generate the kind of jobs and economic diversity we need. Also, while one can debate the impact of development along I-70 upon our small-town character, a large mall is, by definition, its antithesis.

A fresh innovative plan shaped through an open public design process would have a much higher likelihood of success in generating the jobs and revenue we seek, while complementing small town character in the process. Even if you like the current plan, a “no” vote strengthens the town's ability to negotiate a better deal.

I hope you'll join me and support local business, local flavor, innovation, small-town character and Eagle's future by respectfully voting no on ERS.

Adam Palmer

Eagle