A guide to joint property ownership in the Vail Valley | VailDaily.com

A guide to joint property ownership in the Vail Valley

Rohn Robbins
Vail, CO, Colorado

Partition is the act of splitting. Think Moses and the Red Sea, dividing into parts.

Partition in the legal context involves the dividing of lands held by joint tenants, or tenants in common, into distinct portions, so that they may hold them in severalty (that is, separately). But hold on just a sec. A little elaboration of our terms seems apropos for Vail Valley readers.

Joint tenants

A joint tenant is not a renter who smokes pot, although the term seems apt. A joint tenant is one who owns property with another such that he or she has an indivisible interest in the whole thing that’s owned.

If you think of a circle owned by two people in joint tenancy, both people own the entire circle together. Dissimilarly, in a tenancy in common, draw a line down the center of the circle and each of the owners owns a distinct and divisible half circle.

Participate in The Longevity Project

The Longevity Project is an annual campaign to help educate readers about what it takes to live a long, fulfilling life in our valley. This year Kevin shares his story of hope and celebration of life with his presentation Cracked, Not Broken as we explore the critical and relevant topic of mental health.

Say you and I own a house together. We are joint tenants if each of us has an equal interest in the whole thing as opposed to tenants in common, who each own a distinct half of the thing. Incidentally, joint tenants also enjoy a right of survivorship whereas tenants in common do not. What this means is that if one of the two parties who owns the home together dies, the survivor, by some alchemy of law, automatically owns both his or her own share plus the half of the deceased without any special legal

incantation having to be recited.

While a tenant in common can leave his interest to his co-tenant in common via a will, trust, or other device, inheritance of his interest by the co-tenant is not automatic and, except for certain blood relationships, does not transpire absent an expression of the deceased’s intent, such as in a will.


“Co-parcener” sounds like a couple of pious biddies who go to church together, doesn’t it? But not in the lexicon of the law. Co-parceney arises when several persons take ownership of land by descent from the same ancestor as one heir. All co-parceners then constitute one heir, all sharing in a single, undivided estate (or ownership) in the land and being connected by a unity of interest and of title.

Stated simply, co-parceners inherit land together from the same person and own that interest in the land together. In other words, I don’t own this little hillock and you don’t own the wetlands and riparian rights ” we both have a sort of muddy inter-connected interest in, and title to, the whole thing. Can you, then, build the cabin that you’ve always dreamed of on the hillock that I’d like to claim as mine? Can I wade in the wetlands that I covet but which you consider to be your own? Not without the device of partition which carves up the land in a this-is-yours and this-is-mine sort of fashion. More on that in just a moment.

Parenthetically, today, in the modern American south, co-parceney is busily dividing up many of what were once were the great estates, largely in cases where the now-deceased common ancestor failed to make a will.

Severalty and partition

Finally, a word about severalty. Severalty indicates an estate (or ownership of land) that is held by a person in his own right only, without any other person being joined or connected with him. In other words, it’s mine all mine.

Back to partition. Partition is any division of property (usually, but not always) real property between co-owners resulting in individual ownership of the interests of each. Partition can be compulsory (that is judicial) or voluntary.

In the Moses and the Red Sea example, once the seas have cleaved, partition might occur where one party owns the reared west bank and another the poised, retreated east.

A quick example of compulsory (that is judicial) partition might help here. Suppose you and I own 70 acres of undeveloped land together as joint tenants. You want to sell. I don’t. Since we each own part of the whole thing, rather than owning separate halves, and since we’ve been at each other’s throats and can’t agree on anything anymore, we go to court.

The court determines that the only fair thing to do is to split the parcel right down the center stripe. You get half amounting to 35 acres and I get the other 35. Of course, we could voluntarily agree to the same thing without the intervention of the court.

In a tenancy in common, since each party owns a divisible half, the matter of division is usually more easily accommodated.

Partition, then, is a legal means of carving up the Christmas goose of property in a way that a fair and equitable outcome is devised and subscribed under the law. It is the hopefully bloodless way that ownership is fairly parsed so everybody walks away with a impartial portion of what is jointly claimed and keeps that portion as their very own.

Rohn K. Robbins is an attorney licensed before the Bars of Colorado and California who practices in the Vail Valley. He is a member of the Colorado State Bar Association Legal Ethics Committee and is a former adjunct professor of law. He may be heard on Wednesday nights at 7 p.m. on KZYR radio (97.7 FM) as host of “Community Focus.” Robbins may be reached at 970-926.4461 or at his e-mail address: robbins@colorado.net.

Support Local Journalism