Guns have no power themselves
Since the Heller decision was handed down by the Supremes, every gun hater, grabber and believer that the government is more important than the individual is trying to make their case that the court got it wrong, and the country will now descend into a pit of animal violence.
I have guns, most of my friends have them, and no one I call friend would advocate forcible disarmament. But for all those guns, not one owner believes them to be anything but inanimate chunks of metal and plastic. They may think of them as elegant machines, means to defense, or artifacts requiring skill to master, but never a thing possessed of power in itself. The true fetishists are the Bradys and the Sugarmanns and the Helmkes, for they are the ones who see what is essentially a mundane tool as a magical idol which can take over the mind of whoever holds it.
This isn’t to say there is not a philosophical aspect to the decision to go armed. I think about it every day, and more intelligent people than I have put words to the thoughts of everyone who carries a firearm for defense. But a philosophy is a human thing, and my firearm does not have one. In truth, it would make things easier if it did ” we could simply prohibit the possession of evil guns and limit people to owning the good ones.
It is commonplace to note the use of projection by the gun controllers, even though that term implies that guns are capable of independent action. It is obvious that many of them distrust themselves and cannot conceive of people who think differently than they, thus everyone should be disarmed for the good of all.
I think there is some validity in the projection argument, but in the end it leads nowhere ” as true as it may be, it is still a form of name calling and will convince neither the anti-gunners nor have much effect on the uncommitted.
But there is a corollary argument: While Paul, Sarah and Josh, do not go home every night filled with rage and glad they do not have a gun handy, they do lie, misrepresent, and slander. They do those things because they believe their means are justified by their ends, and believe, or have convinced themselves, that their opponents do the same.
It is this projection which is the most egregious and makes them most vulnerable, for it can be countered most effectively not only by letters to the editor but simple everyday actions ” every time we take a new person shooting, or engage in community service, we give lie to the claim that gun-owners are bitter knuckle-draggers one step away from being mass murderers. Lies and slander consist of words, and should be responded to with truth and goodwill, but they are also actions, and can be defeated by actions.
Support Local Journalism
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User