Obama’s a socialist
Avon, CO, Colorado
I’ve been reading a lot about what Barack Obama said when he spoke with Joe the Plumber, saying that when we spread the wealth around, everyone benefits.
I agreed with his words. Any time you help to produce or deliver products or services, you are “spreading the wealth around.” Any time you trade products or service with another person, both parties in the transaction are “spreading the wealth around.” Any time you buy stock in a company, you help finance that company and you’re spreading the wealth around. Any time you put money in a savings plan, you’re helping to finance others, and you’re spreading the wealth around.
If you hire someone, you’re spreading the wealth around. If you go to work for someone else, you’re spreading the wealth around. Even if you’re a miser and you buy gold to bury in your back yard, you’re supporting the gold mining and processing industry and all the people they employ throughout the supply chain, and you’re spreading the wealth around.
But we all know that Obama wasn’t talking about peaceable, voluntary exchange of goods and services between free citizens. He was talking about spreading the wealth around, using force and the threat of force. If you believe that I’m using hyperbole, just try not paying your taxes. Look how far that got Wesley Snipes.
To put it another way, Obama and all who think similarly, does not trust you to produce they way he thinks you should produce, so he wants to tell you how to do it. He doesn’t trust you to make your own purchasing and financing decisions, so he’s going to do more of that for you. Obama and socialists everywhere are jealous of your abilities to produce and they’re jealous of the freedom you’ve had in spreading your wealth around. Make no mistake about it, that jealousy leads to anger and hatred.
We can look at the political struggle in this country in this way: Either you favor spreading the wealth around through peaceable, voluntary exchange, or you favor spreading the wealth around through the use of force and the threat of force. I would warn you that the two sides (socialists and capitalists) have incompatible measures of “success.”
You may think that success means more people living at higher standards, with more choices in life, more mobility, a better life span and so on. You’d be wrong if you think socialists will see that as a desirable outcome.
Ryan Bowers Avon
Support Local Journalism
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User