Oil shale back on the front burner | VailDaily.com
YOUR AD HERE »

Oil shale back on the front burner

Donna Gray
** ADVANCE FOR Monday OCT. 3 ** Heaters surround the test well Thursday, July 28, 2005, at Shell Oil's Mahogany Project southwest of Meeker, Colorado. They have been working for nine years on a way to bake shale oil from the ground by using heating rods drilled into layers of rock.(AP Photo/Douglas C. Pizac)
AP | AP

GLENWOOD SPRINGS – Since the Bureau of Land Management announced its oil shale research-and-development leasing program earlier this month, eight energy companies in Colorado have applied for a chance to make the alternative energy source an economic reality.The eight, ranging from companies involved in the oil shale boom of the early ’80s to new ventures, are among 19 companies that applied for parcels of public land in Colorado, Wyoming and Utah. The three states hold the world’s largest concentration of oil shale, the equivalent, the land bureau says, of 2.6 trillion barrels of oil – 20 times more than the total U.S. oil resource of 116.5 billion barrels.Exxon Mobile and Chevron Shale Oil Co. have applied for the 160-acre leases, said James Edwards, chief of the solid minerals branch of the land bureau’s main office in Colorado.Both were key players in the oil shale boom of the late ’70s and early ’80s. Exxon pulled out of its Colony Oil Shale Project on Sunday, May 2, 1982, leaving more than 2,000 people without jobs and precipitating an economic bust that still reverberates in Garfield County.The land bureau has offered the leases for 10 years. During that time, if the companies demonstrate their technology for extracting oil from shale is sound and there is a viable market for the product, they have the option of expanding the holding to 5,120 acres, Edwards said.”They have to make a showing that the selling (of the product) exceeds the cost to produce it,” he said.

Strategic resourceWhen companies like Exxon and Chevron staked their claims to oil shale in the ’70s, they were backed by hefty government subsidies from the Synthetic Fuels Corp., established by Congress under President Jimmy Carter. Energy companies got the boost to spur them to find alternative sources of crude. Back then, the conventional wisdom was that once crude hit $35 a barrel, oil shale production would be commercially feasible. The price never shot that high nor did the efforts of Exxon and others prove economic.Now, as crude prices hit $66 a barrel, the federal government is driven by the same fear of a dwindling world supply. Earlier this year, the Department of Energy’s Office of Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves met with energy companies in Washington, D.C., to discuss the state of oil resources and the need for a strategic plan to develop oil shale as an alternative fuel before oil reserves give out. In the early 1900s, the federal government set aside thousands of acres in Colorado’s Piceance Basin and the Uintah Basin in Utah as the Naval Oil Shale Reserves to protect what it saw as a strategic energy resource.The Energy Policy Act of 2005 requires the land bureau to begin leasing oil shale tracts for commercial production by August, 2007, Edwards said.The land bureau will review the leases with a team of experts from the departments of Energy and Defense, Edwards said. “We’re shooting to have the leases issued and operations to start next summer.”Cleaning up afterwardsIn evaluating the proposed technologies, “we’ll want to ask is this someone’s science experiment or will it really work,” he said. Exxon Mobil and Chevron will also try an in-ground heating approach, now being tested by Shell Oil in its Mahogany Research Project in the Piceance Basin. Since 2000, Shell Oil has been testing an in-ground heating system that will liquefy the shale which it them pumps out on the approximately 20,000 acres it owns in Rio Blanco County. Shell applied for three parcels under the land bureau’s research and development leasing program.”Seventy to 80 percent of the oil shale (in the Piceance Basin) is on federal land,” said Jill Davis, spokeswoman for Shell. Shell’s land is near the western lip of the basin, she said. The richest resource is in the center of the basin, owned by the land bureau.”The opportunity to convert (the 160-acre parcel) to 5,120 acres is very important to us,” she said. “Once we have the capacity and infrastructure in place then we could upgrade to commercial production. That’s why the opportunity to go to the 5,120 acres is important, to be able to do the final phase of research and go commercial on the same acreage.”Shell recently initiated the second phase of its Mahogany Research program, testing a “freeze wall” that sets up a barrier between the heating zone around its well bores and groundwater. It does not expect to go to commercial production before “the end of the decade,” Davis said.Other companies that have applied for leases will use a more traditional “room-and-pillar” mining system and a retort process above ground which heats the shale to extract the oil.”We’re also very concerned about their investment capacities,” Edwards said. “Do these people have the wherewithal to pursue this and clean it up afterwards?”Once companies go to the 5,120-acre commercial parcels, federal environmental laws must be met. Companies will be required to do substantial environmental studies for each commercial parcel, Edwards said. Vail, Colorado


Support Local Journalism


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User