Pitkin County opposes forest fees | VailDaily.com
YOUR AD HERE »

Pitkin County opposes forest fees

Intense lobbying by citizens helped convince the Pitkin County commissioners to join the fight against a federal government program that charges fees to visit national forests and other public lands.

The commissioners said they will prepare a resolution later this month opposing the national Recreation Fee Demonstration Project. They will urge Colorado’s congressional delegation to more fully fund public land management agencies like the U.S. Forest Service so fees aren’t necessary.

A representative of the Forest Service and critics of the fee program disagreed during the commissioners’ meeting over the potential of the program to grow.



Martha Moran, recreation manager for the Aspen Ranger District, said fees will be used in just a few special cases, like access to Maroon Lake. She claimed the public doesn’t have to worry about facing a fee simply to hike a favorite trail in the forests around Aspen.

“We’re not going to charge for hiking,” said Moran. “We tested it. It’s not a good idea.”



Moran said the Forest Service released a report about a year ago that outlines its blueprint for charging fees. But critics contended that the Forest Service’s blueprint and legislators’ visions don’t match.

“Sooner or later you will be asked to pay to do it all,” claimed Malcolm McMichael, a Carbondale resident and opponent of fees to use public lands.

McMichael said the Forest Service already approved a program that allows Copper Mountain ski resort to charge $120 per day for skiers and riders to go to the front of chairlift lines.



Opposition to forest fees is being led by the Western Slope No Fee Coalition. Co-founder Kitty Benzar told the county commissioners that the program was created in 1996 as a two-year test. Eight years later it is still alive, although no public hearings have been held.

Aspenite Annette Keller, a self-titled “fierce opponent of fee demo,” said the theory of having users “pay to play” sounds good but creates conflicts with the Forest Service’s mandate to manage public lands.

Congress has created a profit motive for the Forest Service and other agencies, Keller reasoned. The agencies have an incentive to come up with a reason to charge people to visit a site. To get a site up to snuff, the Forest Service builds or enhances facilities at places like Maroon Lake.

“It’s going to cause us to develop our public lands,” said Keller.

Forester Moran disputed the claim. She said Congress regularly awards funds to build facilities through standard budgets. The Maroon Lake bathroom and visitors’ center were funded through special appropriations. The problem is the agency often doesn’t have the funds to properly run and maintain those facilities. The fee demo program is critical to clean the toilets and rebuilt campgrounds in Maroon Creek Valley, she said.

“If we don’t charge fees, how do we manage the Maroon Bells?” Moran asked.


Support Local Journalism