Proposed tax law changes |

Proposed tax law changes

Dan Jarosz

The President’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform recently released a 270-page report that recommended two ways to modify the U.S. Federal tax code. (This federal tax reform report can be accessed at One plan is known as the “Simplified Income Tax Plan” and the other is the “Growth and Investment Tax Plan.” Both of these proposals seek to make the tax code fair and simple. It is important to note that at this time, these are merely the panel’s recommendations. There is a complicated and long legislative process that is involved anytime changes are made to the tax code.

The mortgage interest deduction, which is currently capped at $1.1 million, would be turned into a 15-percent credit and apply only to principal residences. In addition, the maximum debt eligible for the credit would be limited to 125 percent of the median sales price for the county, based upon Federal Housing Administration data (current limits range between $227,147 and $411,704). It is estimated that between 85 – 90 percent of all mortgages originated in 2004 fall below these levels. There would be transition tax relief for those with mortgages above the proposed dollar caps and the new caps would be phased in over a five-year period for pre-existing mortgages.

Potential impact: Converting a deduction into a credit provides the same tax rate to all taxpayers, although taxpayers in higher tax brackets will lose more tax savings from converting a deduction into a 15 percent credit. In addition, limiting the credit to only principal residences may have a negative impact on the costs of owning vacation home properties, which might ultimately impact the demand for this type of property.

The deduction for state and local taxes, including real estate taxes, would be repealed.

Potential impact: This change, coupled with the change in claiming mortgage interest deductions, would make property ownership more expensive on an after-tax basis. Investors may begin to reallocate new investments away from real estate and into other investment alternatives.

The tax exclusion for capital gain on the sale of a primary residence would remain. However, the ownership and use period would be lengthened to three out of five years, versus the two out of five years requirement under the current law.

Potential impact: Homeowners will generally need to stay in their principal residences one more year to qualify for the $500,000, married filing jointly, or $250,000, single, tax exclusion available under IRC Section 121. This additional holding period requirement may reduce the volume of property sales and negatively impact those services associated with the sale and transfer of real estate.

For additional information about this and title related issues contact Dan Jarosz at Stewart Title of Vail at (970) 926.0230 or

Support Local Journalism

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User