Small ripples but no big waves from drought
If the drought of 2002 has yielded no major waves of change, it has produced ripples. Chris Treese, director of governmental affairs for the Colorado River Water Conservation District, points to two of them.First, state legislators passed a law allowing water banking. In essence, this allows water now used for agriculture to more easily be reallocated for use by cities in water-short years.
“It really makes water administration more flexible,” Treese says.Second are interruptible water supplies. Again, the most likely buyers of the water would be cities or towns, and the most likely sellers would be farmers or ditch or reservoir companies.
“So far, they’re just ripples’ from the 2002 drought. They’re largely unproven,” Treese says. “We haven’t seen a lot of water banks nor have we seen a lot of interruptible supply arrangements made.”A third response has been more focus on conservation measures. Again, like the legislative changes, this change lies more in the realm of possible than the real.
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Vail, Beaver Creek and Eagle Valley make the Vail Daily’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.