Arbitration is not a ‘blow to workers’ rights,’ as Mitsch Bush claims (letter) | VailDaily.com

Arbitration is not a ‘blow to workers’ rights,’ as Mitsch Bush claims (letter)

To the editor: The title of this opinion column by Diane Mitsch Bush should read

“Supreme Court decision a blow to trial lawyers and Democratic politicians” (“Supreme Court decision a blow to workers’ rights,” Saturday, June 9). The former will no longer enjoy the lucrative fees generated by class-action employee lawsuits. The latter will no longer receive the campaign contributions funded by these fees.

The trial lawyer bar has been a mainstay of financial support to the Democratic Party in exchange for legislation that encourages litigation and lines the lawyers’ pockets.

No surprise, therefore, that Ms. Bush, a Democrat, decries the Supreme Court’s decision.

Support Local Journalism

On the merits, the decision is correct. Arbitration has been the Congressionally endorsed strong public policy of the United States since the 1930s. Arbitration is much more economical than litigation, and arbitrators are chosen for their expertise in the types of cases they hear, in this instance, employment cases.

Workers will not suffer on account of this decision, though the trial bar and Democrats may. That outcome is no reason to bemoan the Supreme Court’s decision.

Gerald Katz

Edwards


Support Local Journalism

Readers around Vail, Beaver Creek and Eagle Valley make the Vail Daily’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.

 


Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.