Carnes: I can’t not help explain this merry-go-round of Trump retractions (column)
July 23, 2018
After the Stinky in Helsinki, I feel obligated to help folks understand the difficultly in not speaking incorrectly from time to time.
Wait, I mean "speaking correctly." Sort of a double negative, if you don't not catch my drift.
I think not (note the singular negative).
This is like Dick Nixon saying, "I am not not a crook," George Washington claiming, "I can't not tell a lie" or Bill Clinton admitting, "I didn't not have sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinski …"
I felt like my intelligence had been highly insulted by his claims of "misspoke," but then the president let me know (via tweet) that only those at the "higher ends of intelligence" would have loved and understood how successful his meeting with Putin actually was.
Recommended Stories For You
That made me feel so much better, but only until my wife explained it to me.
He continued by calling out the fake news media as the "real enemy of the people" and thought, based upon Putin's "extremely strong and powerful" denial, that it was an "incredible offer" to let the Russian criminal help investigate the American crime he committed by interrogating American citizens.
My head started aching again at that point.
What with all the double negative misspokes, I was beginning to question if Kim Jong Un actually said, "I meant I wouldn't denuclearize" and if down in Texas the shouted phrase is, "Don't not forget the Alamo."
A double negative is a positive, right?
When Mick Jagger sang, "I can't get no satisfaction," we all knew he was actually bragging that he "gets" plenty, right? (Wink-wink, nudge-nudge.)
And I am now to assume this means the European Union is not a foe and Mexico is not paying for the wall?
Please correct me if I am wrong, as evidently I confuse easily.
I would say the president wouldn't have used "would" when he could have used "wouldn't," but he also could have used "could" on account of the facts, but U.S. intelligence offices saying he "should."
And who can forget Lindsey Vonn saying, "I won't not accept an invitation to the White House" and Mikaela Shiffrin saying, "I won't not shun Vail Resorts for Alterra."
It all makes so much sense now.
Yes, and the president isn't not in Putin's pocket and can't never not tell the truth (a triple negative?) as he has never not misspoken for the last 500 days or so.
I sincerely hope this doesn't not help with your understanding of our current situation, but here's one more to help drive the point home.
"Don't Make America Not Great Again."
Now that, ladies and gentlemen, is what you call a real "double negative."
At least no one is not saying "covfefe" anymore.
Richard Carnes, of Avon, writes weekly. He can be reached at email@example.com.
Trending In: Opinion
- Mazzuca: A conservative perspective on the current state of our government (column)
- Van Ens: NFL fumbles at taking a knee (column)
- Carnes: Monochrome, Technicolor memories of a first fall season in Vail (column)
- The future of our local wildlife is up to us; just say ‘no’ to paved access to Berlaimont (letter)
- Taft Conlin’s parents appealing son’s Vail skier death case, saying judges erred in several rulings before and during trial
- Accused murderer Jacob White scheduled to plead and be sentenced Friday, Sept. 21, in Catherine Kelley case
- Police in the Vail Valley try to offer help to people who are panhandling
- Rancher cries as jury exonerates her
- Brake fire closes Interstate 70 at East Vail, burns landscaping material Monday morning, Sept. 17