Climate Action Collaborative: The Paris Agreement and what you need to know
Special to the Daily
The evidence of climate change and its impacts have become nightly news with raging wildfires, severe drought, a record number of hurricanes, and accelerating retreat of ice shelves. The impact of our fossil fuel-based industrialized society, depletion of natural biological resources, and exponential population growth has set the stage for a grand experiment in global awareness and cooperation on climate change.
The Paris Agreement on climate change is the most recent and current global agreement on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Signed in 2016, this agreement has been signed by all 196 members of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
The Paris Agreement builds upon past efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, 1997 Kyoto Protocol, the 2009 Copenhagen Accord (which set up the Green Climate Fund), and the 2012 Doha Amendment (which extended the Kyoto Protocol to 2020). The Kyoto Protocol sought to establish binding emission reduction targets to be hit by 2012 for countries and 191 countries ratified it; however, the United States dropped out in 2001 and never ratified the agreement.
The Kyoto Protocol sought to establish specific targets and commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions for each country along with a legal mechanism for enforcement. In contrast, the Paris Agreement emphasizes consensus-building and allows for voluntary and nationally determined targets. Each country that is a party to the Paris Agreement has made a non-binding political commitment to implement actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and report those actions; however, there is no enforcement mechanism that can force any country to set a specific emission target by a specific date.
The Paris Agreement seeks to limit the increase of global temperatures to 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit (1.5 degrees Celsius), which is predicted to limit the impacts of climate change to manageable levels. The 186 countries that are responsible for more than 90 percent of global emissions submitted carbon reduction targets, known as “intended nationally determined contributions.” These targets not only describe commitments for curbing emissions, but also include preservation of “carbon sinks,” which are biologically rich forest ecosystems that draw carbon out of the atmosphere.
Each country is permitted to determine its own targets and timeframes under the Paris Agreement. Prior to the Trump presidency, the United States set goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 26-28% below 2005 emission levels by 2025. Specific initiatives included a Clean Power Plan to cut carbon pollution form the power sector and improvements to automotive fuel efficiency standards to reduce transportation emissions.
Another critical component of the Paris Agreement is the commitment of developed nations to provide financing to assist developing nations with climate change adaptation and mitigation via the Green Climate Fund. Abundant opportunities exist to reduce greenhouse gas for substantially less cost per metric ton in developing countries compared to industrialized countries. The original collective financing goal was $100 billion per year from 2020 through 2025; however, only $10.3 billion has been pledged and $8.2 billion confirmed as of early 2020. The United States pledged $3 billion under the Obama administration, but only transferred $1 billion before the Trump Administration came to office and halted further payments.
Despite the global support of all nations for the Paris Agreement (Iran and Turkey are the only significant emitters that are not parties), President Trump announced intentions to withdraw from the Paris Agreement in June, 2017. Per the terms of the Paris Agreement, the notice of withdrawal by the United States would become effective in November 2020. President Trump cited disadvantage and unfairness to the American workers and the cost of payments to the Green Climate Fund as reasons for withdrawing from the Paris Agreement.
The Green Climate Fund website lists the United States’ $3 billion pledged contribution as $55k per capita. Contributions from other first-world nations range from $36k per capita for Japan to $48k per capita for Germany to as high as $85k per capita for Switzerland and $98k for Norway. Although the pledged per capita contribution by the United States is higher than other more populous first world countries, the greenhouse gas emissions per capita from the United States is nearly twice that of Japan and Germany and three to four times as high as European countries that have embraced green economies.
The Trump administration reduced environmental standards and requirements for the power sector and automotive industry, including replacing the Clean Power Plan with the Affordable Clean Energy Rule (lowering greenhouse gas reductions from 32% by 2030 to 1%), and relaxing fuel economy improvements from 5% per year down to 1.5% per year. These actions undermine and frustrate the ability of the United States to meet its greenhouse gas reduction goals by 2025. These actions also undermine the role of the United States as a leader among developed nations.
Recognition of the need to mitigate climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions dates back to the Rio Earth Summit and the George H. W. Bush presidency in 1992. The Paris Agreement represents the latest and greatest global consensus and participation to date. Withdrawal from the Paris Agreement by the United States presents a significant risk of undermining the current global consensus for greenhouse gas emissions, which may slow the commitment and progress for all nations.
We have “kicked the can down the road” for several decades with minimal actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Now there is overwhelming consensus in the scientific community that there is not much road remaining in the current direction. Continuation of the Paris Agreement, or negotiation of a comparable and effective alternative, is needed for a global effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Many scientists are sounding the emergency alarm that an immediate change in direction that substantially reduces greenhouse gas emissions and carbon loading in the atmosphere is the only rational and responsible option available.
This direction is also in line with the Eagle County Climate Action Plan which calls for a 25% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2025 and an 80% reduction by 2050.
Eric Heil is the Avon town manager. The Climate Action Collaborative is working to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Eagle County 25 percent by 2025 and 80 percent by 2050.
Support Local Journalism
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User