Vail Daily column: Business vitality is in everyone’s best interest
Vail Valley Partnership
As we head into spring (let’s be like the rest of the world and get past calling it offseason, or even worse, mud season and just call it spring), most indicators are tracking solidly and some are tracking at record levels.
First quarter lodging occupancy, record sales tax collections, new flight service this winter from Toronto, increased load factors on other flights, consistent snow conditions and a continually improving economy all worked in our favor. Our most recent economic indicators report (found at VailValley
Partnership.com) shows increased employment numbers and a slow increase in weekly wages.
Most businesses that I’ve talked to are reporting a strong first quarter and business operators are optimistic moving into summer. We’re teed up to have a solid winter next year with the return of the 2015 FIS Alpine World Ski Championships.
The question remains: How do we continue this upward trajectory? The simple answer is to increase the number of customers. More customers — both local and destination visitors — is the key to overall business vitality and our future sustained success as a community. Basic economic theory states that more customers create more opportunities for businesses to grow their market share. The same number of customers (or fewer customers) causes businesses to have to steal market share from others.
Support Local Journalism
Everyone should agree that bringing more customers here is the easiest way to ensure continued growth across all business segments, including demand for real estate (and increased home values), increased sales tax collections in our municipalities and increased opportunities for business success.
It’s a pretty simple formula: More customers/visitors equals more money spent locally. This results in a healthier business community, which in turn creates more jobs and increased competition for existing jobs and thus higher wages. A healthier business community results in more sales tax dollars for our municipalities to provide their services (including capital expenses, local infrastructure needs, health and human services support and other government services).
Business vitality is clearly in everyone’s best interest. Outside of bringing more visitors to the valley, the next best way to ensure business vitality is to have more money is our customers pockets.
Property owners should have their local ballots in hand for special elections in May. Specifically, the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District is posing a choice to voters related to an increased property tax or a rate increase. This is a unique choice as we are going to pay more regardless of whether you vote yes or no — it’s simply a matter of how our community will pay for it.
We are all inherently motivated by self-interest — this isn’t a political statement or position, but rather an encouragement to voters to do what is in your best interest as citizens and business owners. We should all be motivated by having more money in our pockets as this results in more money being spent locally, thus helping create a more vibrant business community. The ballot issue being posed by the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District is at its core a basic math equation for voters: will I have more money in my pockets if I vote “yes” for the property tax increase or will I have more money in my pocket if I vote “no” and choose a rate increase instead?
One size doesn’t fit all. Many voters will spend less by voting “yes on” ballot issue A: Homes with a market value of $500,000 will pay $29.22 in annual property tax or will pay $59.88 by voting “no” and instead choosing the rate increase. Again, using the $500,000 home value as a baseline, this is an effective annual increase of $2.11 as the district has a bond expiring in 2016 when the new debt service would begin.
It’s not an apples-to-apples comparison (it’s more like an apples to Volkswagen comparison), but there is a sliding scale and a point somewhere around a home with a market value of $3-5 million where voters will pay less with a rate increase. So clearly it is in some homeowners interest to vote for the rate increase rather than the property tax option — they’ll have more money in their pockets by voting for the rate increase and against the property tax.
There are other considerations for voters, including the ability of the district to apply for state grants or other alternative funding sources, but the basic question being posed is, “How do we choose to pay for these capital improvements?”
When voting in any local election, consider the question “Will my vote help business vitality by increasing visitors or putting more money in customers pockets?” Don’t vote “yes” or “no” without understanding this basic question, a question that has a different answer for everyone.
These things are sometimes contrary to each other or might not apply equally to all consumers, but balancing the question of putting more money in the pockets of customers, increasing customers (tourists) here and always asking how your vote might contribute to business vitality. We are going to pay regardless; individually, voters should choose the option that puts more money into our local economy.
Chris Romer is president and CEO of Vail Valley Partnership.