Considering growing interest in motorized sports, do we really need more wilderness? (letter)
March 6, 2018
What a wonderful area we live in. We are so lucky to have so much public land around us to enjoy so many activities. We have acres and acres of forest that is protected, and we have more than 250,000 acres of restricted-use wilderness around us.
The question is, do we have enough area to recreate in all the different ways that people enjoy? If we take the nearly 100,000 acres of proposed wilderness and restrict all mechanized use, does this leave our growing population enough area to use our mechanized equipment?
I don't think so.
Each year, there are more mountain bikers, dirt bikers and low-impact, over-the-snow machines that need areas to recreate. Don't we have enough wilderness at this point?
Trending In: Opinion
- The future of our local wildlife is up to us; just say ‘no’ to paved access to Berlaimont (letter)
- Our view: Restrictions may be lifted, but it’s still dry in the backcountry (editorial)
- Thomas: A history lesson on the Founding Fathers, courtesy of Brett Kavanaugh (column)
- Scatter ashes wherever, but don’t bring headstones into the wilderness (letter)
- Why I volunteer as a mentor with the Vail Valley Foundation’s YouthPower365 (letter)
- Vail Valley entrepreneur launches bikes into a new niche in the e-bike world
- Accused murderer Jacob White scheduled to plead and be sentenced Friday, Sept. 21, in Catherine Kelley case
- Eagle County Open Space celebrates new motocross park in Gypsum
- Hardscrabble Ranch plan, and name change options, will be unveiled Wednesday night, Sept. 19
- Vail Valley boy suffers only minor injuries after colliding with food truck