Considering growing interest in motorized sports, do we really need more wilderness? (letter)
March 6, 2018
What a wonderful area we live in. We are so lucky to have so much public land around us to enjoy so many activities. We have acres and acres of forest that is protected, and we have more than 250,000 acres of restricted-use wilderness around us.
The question is, do we have enough area to recreate in all the different ways that people enjoy? If we take the nearly 100,000 acres of proposed wilderness and restrict all mechanized use, does this leave our growing population enough area to use our mechanized equipment?
I don't think so.
Each year, there are more mountain bikers, dirt bikers and low-impact, over-the-snow machines that need areas to recreate. Don't we have enough wilderness at this point?
Trending In: Opinion
- Support clean car standards that protect our citizens, environment (letter)
- Article on Bode Miller’s daughter drowning in poor taste (letter)
- Wissot: Love affair with reality TV produced Donald Trump, our first ‘authentic’ president (column)
- Mark Williams best choice for Congress in the Second District (letter)
- Perhaps wildlife fencing disrupting migration patterns is to blame for decline in numbers (letter)
- Vail Valley churches, law enforcement plan for protests by Westboro Baptist Church
- Fire forcing evacuations in part of Oak Meadows outside Glenwood Springs
- Five local farmers markets coming to Vail Valley this summer
- Crowds enthusiastically embrace first two shows of Whistle Pig Vail concert series: Dispatch, Robert Plant
- Eagle Flight Days was fun for all in downvalley town (photo gallery)