Considering growing interest in motorized sports, do we really need more wilderness? (letter)
March 6, 2018
What a wonderful area we live in. We are so lucky to have so much public land around us to enjoy so many activities. We have acres and acres of forest that is protected, and we have more than 250,000 acres of restricted-use wilderness around us.
The question is, do we have enough area to recreate in all the different ways that people enjoy? If we take the nearly 100,000 acres of proposed wilderness and restrict all mechanized use, does this leave our growing population enough area to use our mechanized equipment?
I don't think so.
Each year, there are more mountain bikers, dirt bikers and low-impact, over-the-snow machines that need areas to recreate. Don't we have enough wilderness at this point?
Trending In: Opinion
- In the fight of good versus evil, wouldn’t you rather have a gun for defense? (letter)
- Wolves are killing machines; protect Colorado wildlife by making sure they never come here (letter)
- St. Patrick’s Day reminder: Traffic fatalities in Colorado still largely due to DUI (letter)
- Vail Daily letter: White genocide nearly imminent in South Africa
- Sportsmen support Continental Divide Recreation, Wilderness and Camp Hale Legacy Act (letter)
- Shiffrin says she’ll ‘keep it simple’ next season
- Lindsey Vonn finishes with final podium and sense of YOLO
- Vail, seeking an event to fill beds in May, to partially fund MMA at ice arena
- 8 places to party near Vail on St. Patrick’s Day
- Department of Wildlife: ‘Blast of winter-type weather’ likely led to uptick in mountain lion sightings