Could brick-and-mortar stores in Gypsum really compete with online retailers? (editorial)
March 13, 2018
Is Gypsum a retail hot spot waiting to happen?
That was a conclusion of a town-sponsored study, conducted by The Retail Coach, a national research company. According to the study, the Gypsum market suffers from what experts call "leakage" — consumer spending and sales tax collections that could be kept in town.
The Retail Coach study found that Gypsum's leakage is substantial: More than $28 million in lost sales in clothing alone. Looked at in terms of just the town's 3 percent sales tax, that's $840,000 that could be going into the local government's coffers.
Sales tax is the life's blood for municipal governments in Colorado. That's what pays for everything from road repairs and police protection to town parks and other extras.
The good news for Gypsum and its residents is that the town collects sales taxes from both Costco and all of the retail operations at the Eagle County Regional Airport. That means a portion of the sale of every bag of dog food sold at the warehouse store, or every car rental paid for at the airport, goes back to the town for roads, parks and other projects.
Those collections are significant. Still, more retail spending in town would ultimately benefit residents.
Recommended Stories For You
But adding to the town's sales tax base has always been a tricky proposition, and it promises to be even more so in today's economy.
According to a story published on cnbc.com in late December 2017, nearly 7,000 stores closed last year. That's more than double the number of stores that closed in 2016.
Those closures are due in large part to the rise of online shopping. Anyone who's been at the Gypsum Post Office's customer service counter on a Saturday morning sees the phenomenon in full effect.
While there aren't a lot of shopping options in Gypsum now, it's unclear whether new brick-and-mortar options could put a significant dent in the post office lines in town.
Still, there are items — particularly shoes and some clothing items — that people prefer to try on before they buy. Clothing could be an option. So could other stores that sell items people tend to want — or need — without a trip to Glenwood Springs or even an overnight delivery from an online retailer.
With all that in mind, some new retail options in Gypsum would be welcome. But Gypsum and its taxpayers should be cautious if asked to use public funds for much beyond a marketing campaign to lure new retailers to town.
The Vail Daily Editorial Board is Publisher Mark Wurzer, Editor Krista Driscoll and Business Editor Scott Miller.
Trending In: Opinion
- Solomon: Common law language matters in Second Amendment discussion (column)
- Keep U.S. Forest Service ranger station in Dowd Junction to protect wildlife (letter)
- Sanctuary cities are a bad idea, and here’s why (letter)
- Thistlethwaite: Why I will March For Our Lives against gun violence on March 24 in Vail (column)
- District Ranger: Thanks for your feedback on management of public lands (column)
- Cordillera loses more legal challenges to converting Lodge into a rehab center
- Texan tabbed to lead Vail Valley schools; Dr. Carlos Ramirez selected as new superintendent
- Vail Valley third-grader helping lead Colorado measure to allow schools to provide prescribed medical marijuana
- Vail Valley developers proposing hundreds of new apartments in Eagle
- Minturn garage fire blocks Main Street, cause still under investigation