Letter: A conflict of interest in Booth Heights vote
My opinion on this matter brings up two blaring underhanded wrongs. First, the town of Vail’s Planning and Environmental Commission should have recused the young man who is employed by Vail Resorts from any consideration of this matter. Vail Resorts has a vested interest in the outcome wherein a good faith decision is impossible to make. Asking him if he could be impartial is absurd. In corporations, courts, government, town issues, any situation where one has a vested interest and a voting decision has to be made that concerns one’s employer, the individual is recused. This is standard procedure for obvious reasons.
Also the $100,000 appears to be a “sweetening of the pot” to keep the town council appeased with no further interference. The PEC vote should be overturned, the Vail employee recused, and the vote retaken.
Support Local Journalism
Readers around Vail, Beaver Creek and Eagle Valley make the Vail Daily’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.
Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.
Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.
Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.
User Legend: Moderator Trusted User