Letter: Gun restrictions can’t supersede Second Amendment to Constitution
October 18, 2017
When bad actions take place, such as what happened in Las Vegas, some people are so quick and desperate to propose ways to deter such actions from reoccurring that they have no care in the world about whether or not such deterrents violate the U.S. Constitution.
Case in point: People who want gun restrictions. They want action to be taken on this issue based on their emotions, moral entrepreneurship, amount of such incidents that occur and comparison of gun laws with other countries, but they can never back up their wishes with the Constitution. They think the former supersedes it and can only speculate hypothetical beliefs of the Founders if they were alive today.
Like it or not, the Constitution does not put a limit on how many guns or how much ammunition people can own, nor does it allow for amendments to be waived or suspended in times of crisis. The only constitutional way for any of that to be changed is for the process stated in Article V to be followed. Anyone who believes otherwise takes liberty for granted.
Boynton Beach, Florida
Trending In: Opinion
- Berlaimont Estates access route (letter)
- Democrats should communicate values, rather than just bashing Trump (letter)
- Noble: We are a country of immigrants, so why are we afraid to embrace Spanish speakers? (column)
- Our View: The Vail Daily endorses some candidates, some ballot issues. Here’s why (editorial)
- Maybe it’s time to wipe the slate clean in Avon on Election Day (letter)
- Arson on the mountain: Vail’s 1998 arson fires at Two Elk were country’s worst eco-terrorist attack
- Former Vail Valley arts patron Alberto Vilar trying to enjoy what’s left of his life after 10-year prison stint
- Town of Vail likely to change short-term rental regulations in response to complaints
- Aspen girl speaks out in video about alleged rape
- Standoff near Breckenridge between police and armed suspect