Letter: Reporting facts without context is meaningless | VailDaily.com

Letter: Reporting facts without context is meaningless

A daily staff report on two more deaths due to the virus in the Vail Valley in the March 31 issue was unduly alarmist and bordered on irresponsible journalism. The report said two 80-year-olds died, one with underlying health conditions but the other exceptionally fit and in good health.  

No other information regarding the deaths was provided, nor any context such as the general death rate of 80-year-olds with the virus.  So, what are we supposed to conclude? That all 80-year-olds, even very fit ones, will die of the virus? For your information, last week’s TIME magazine published death rates for different age groups. The worst-case scenario for 80-year-olds was in Italy where about 20% died. That also means 80% survived. 

If you’re going to publish death notices due to the virus in the Vail Valley, then tell us the whole story. For example, how many people have been hospitalized with the virus? How many are in intensive care? How many have survived? What are their ages? Reporting facts without context is meaningless and will cause people to speculate and draw erroneous conclusions.

Bob Croteau

Support Local Journalism


Support Local Journalism

Readers around Vail, Beaver Creek and Eagle Valley make the Vail Daily’s work possible. Your financial contribution supports our efforts to deliver quality, locally relevant journalism.

Now more than ever, your support is critical to help us keep our community informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having locally. Every contribution, however large or small, will make a difference.

Each donation will be used exclusively for the development and creation of increased news coverage.

For tax deductible donations, click here.

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User