Rankin: Do Common Core education standards work and should we adopt them for science? (column) | VailDaily.com

Rankin: Do Common Core education standards work and should we adopt them for science? (column)

Joyce Rankin
Larry Laszlo |

Remember Common Core? That term first appeared in 2010. It referred, at that time, to the controversial math and English language arts standards that Colorado, along with 41 other states, adopted for kindergarten through 12th grades. Is Common Core working in Colorado, and are we ready to accept new nationally created science standards to align with it? Just how common are Colorado kindergarten through 12th-grade students?

Colorado state law requires a review and revision of the Colorado Academic Standards every six years, with the first review to be completed by July 2018. The Colorado Department of Education, along with input from a committee of teachers, subject experts and interested residents, is reviewing and making recommendations. The State Board of Education will vote on the revisions.

At the January State Board of Education meeting, we heard from committee representatives who reported on the progress in areas of music, science, social studies, reading, writing and communication. Recommendations included minor changes to the existing Colorado standards. However, in the field of science, committee members suggested that we revise the current Colorado standards in favor of the new Next Generation Science Standards.

These nationally created standards are a sequel to the Common Core standards in math and English language arts and are being considered as replacements for Colorado’s current science standards. The creators of Next Generation Science Standards assert that there is a need for a new “conceptual framework,” which will align with Common Core math and English language arts.

Currently, there are no assessments to test against these new standards, so teachers and states will have to adopt new curriculum materials and tests to incorporate the new Next Generation Science Standards. There will, of course, be a cost to local districts. Prices will include teaching materials, assessments, textbooks, teacher training and ongoing professional development.

Nineteen states have adopted the new standards. However, other states have rejected them in favor of keeping their current state science standards. Kentucky, Oklahoma and Wyoming are among those rejecting Next Generation Science Standards. A few of the objections, beyond the fact that they are a national, one-size-fits-all approach, include leaving out content in chemistry and physics, teaching man-made climate change and the overall lack of basic science knowledge.

Colorado adopted math and English language arts Common Core standards in 2010. Are our students doing better academically because of these standards? Are we ready for a dramatic change in science standards?

I’d like to hear your thoughts.

Joyce Rankin is on the State Board of Education representing the 3rd Congressional District. She can be reached at joycerankinsbe@yahoo.com.

Support Local Journalism

Start a dialogue, stay on topic and be civil.
If you don't follow the rules, your comment may be deleted.

User Legend: iconModerator iconTrusted User