Vail Daily letter: Thoughts on trails in Vail
January 3, 2017
Ladies, gentlemen of the Study Committee and Town Council:
Because I was assisting Dr. Steinberg at the first open house, I had little time to speak with others or personally use the comment forms. My sincere thanks to all for giving the community these opportunities to participate in the planning process at this starting point of deliberations and decision-making. I am especially grateful to Gregg Barrie for walking me through the East Vail area where some of the proposed trails are located, and then Dec. 28 for sitting with Dr. Steinberg to discuss the parcels and their possible uses, who understandably cares very deeply about the possible uses.
My own comments at present are as follows.
1. Build workforce housing wherever it is economically and environmentally possible. These spots are few enough but could offer some relief to a major problem.
2. Do not waste time and money on purchase of parcels that do not fit these criteria, unless it would protect our threatened watershed.
3. Under no circumstances develop trails in "open lands" that currently ensure healthy wildlife, or are home to our highly specialized native species, including our fragile plants, fish, amphibians, birds and mammals. I am aghast that the conceptual mountain bike trail on the north side of the Booth Creek area is proposed to encroach on the shelf used by bighorns and even mountain goats as a nursery and respite area in snow months. I am also upset that the south valley trail would run above the Memorial Park just below the historical and current peregrine nest site (which I monitor annually). This would highly likely drive the birds away. It seems also insensitive to encourage aggressive bike use so near the Memorial Park.
Recommended Stories For You
4. Do engage professionals to produce a Biodiversity Study of these areas, as Pitkin County has done, before any decisions on development. Vail's goal of a sustainable community demands this. Our tourism culture based demands it.
5. Since living in California in the '80s and hiking frequently in Marin County, I have followed efforts to make trails compatible to both mountain bikers and hikers. They are still a source of conflict despite best efforts. In Tucson this last winter I again witnessed open hostility between morning walkers and bikers on popular trails. During my own hikes in West Vail, especially if I venture onto the North Trail during summer and fall months, and even occasionally on the Buffehr Trail extension used by so many walkers, I am forced to jump into bushes or cling to crumbling hillsides. No biker has ever yielded to me on a trail, though surprise and speed has sometimes led to falls by both of us. I do not believe these two user groups can ever be truly compatible. On the other hand, East Vail's asphalt trails are a huge success, wide enough for rules of the road to prevail, as well as mutual respect by almost all users. Soft trails are a different matter. Please don't kid yourselves.
In appreciation for all your effort,
Trending In: Opinion
- Mazzuca: Why was planting of American flag omitted from ‘First Man’ film? (column)
- Norton: The smartest person in the room is rarely the one doing the most talking (column)
- The Sandoval family thanks you for your support during their loss (letter)
- Matney: Are depictions of murder, bloodshed, violence and death the best way to have fun? (column)
- Our View: The Vail Daily endorses some candidates, some ballot issues. Here’s why (editorial)
- Arapahoe Basin Ski Area COO Henceroth chimes in on Opening Day
- Loveland man dies in East Vail crash. No one else injured in Sunday evening accident
- Feeling trolled, Breckenridge residents want popular, wooden sculpture removed
- Former Vail Valley arts patron Alberto Vilar trying to enjoy what’s left of his life after 10-year prison stint
- Colorado ski season kicks off at Wolf Creek Ski Area